Madagascar vs Mozambique: Voice and Accountability
Madagascar
0.1124 standard error
in 2011
Mozambique
0.111 standard error
in 2011
Madagascar rank
40th
Mozambique rank
42nd
Voice and Accountability over time
- Madagascar
- Mozambique
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 0.1124 standard error against 0.111 standard error in Mozambique, a difference of 0.0014 standard error.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Madagascar has been ahead every year.
Madagascar ranks 40th and Mozambique ranks 42nd of 53 countries.
Madagascar has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2523 standard error | 0.2265 standard error | 0.0259 standard error | Madagascar |
| 2000s | 0.1602 standard error | 0.141 standard error | 0.0191 standard error | Madagascar |
| 2010s | 0.1117 standard error | 0.1104 standard error | 0.0013 standard error | Madagascar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability, Madagascar or Mozambique?
- Madagascar, at 0.1124 standard error against 0.111 standard error in Mozambique as of 2011.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability between Madagascar and Mozambique?
- 0.0014 standard error, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Mozambique?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Madagascar and Mozambique rank globally for voice and accountability?
- Madagascar ranks 40th and Mozambique ranks 42nd of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Voice and Accountability (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.VOIC.AC.ES. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.