Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) in Maldives

Maldives: Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) was 49.31 0-100 in 2025. ▲ Rising

Latest (2025)
49.31 0-100
Change on year
down 3.1%
World rank
130th
of 208 countries
All-time high
58.51 0-100
in 2009
All-time low
34.25 0-100
in 2004
Years of data
27
1996–2025

Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Maldives, 1996–2025

02040601996201020251996: 39.5 0-1001998: 40.6 0-1002000: 40.8 0-1002002: 41.8 0-1002003: 38.4 0-1002004: 34.3 0-1002005: 41.9 0-1002006: 42.7 0-1002007: 44.9 0-1002008: 53.6 0-1002009: 58.5 0-1002010: 58.1 0-1002011: 57.2 0-1002012: 52.4 0-1002013: 49.5 0-1002014: 49.3 0-1002015: 47.7 0-1002016: 46.6 0-1002017: 44.8 0-1002018: 46 0-1002019: 52.9 0-1002020: 55.3 0-1002021: 54.4 0-1002022: 53.2 0-1002023: 54.3 0-1002024: 50.9 0-1002025: 49.3 0-100

Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 0-100.

Analysis

In 2025, voice and accountability - governance score in Maldives stood at 49.31 0-100.

The figure is down 3.1% on the previous year and up 3.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance score in Maldives peaked at 58.51 0-100 in 2009 and was at its lowest, 34.25 0-100, in 2004.

That places Maldives 130th out of 208 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 27 years of available data.

Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) in Maldives, year by year

Annual values for Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) in Maldives, 1996 to 2025.
Year 0-100 Change
1996 39.47 0-100 —
1998 40.61 0-100 +2.9%
2000 40.76 0-100 +0.4%
2002 41.76 0-100 +2.4%
2003 38.36 0-100 -8.1%
2004 34.25 0-100 -10.7%
2005 41.86 0-100 +22.2%
2006 42.74 0-100 +2.1%
2007 44.92 0-100 +5.1%
2008 53.56 0-100 +19.2%
2009 58.51 0-100 +9.2%
2010 58.09 0-100 -0.7%
2011 57.17 0-100 -1.6%
2012 52.36 0-100 -8.4%
2013 49.53 0-100 -5.4%
2014 49.29 0-100 -0.5%
2015 47.66 0-100 -3.3%
2016 46.65 0-100 -2.1%
2017 44.76 0-100 -4.0%
2018 46.02 0-100 +2.8%
2019 52.9 0-100 +15.0%
2020 55.25 0-100 +4.4%
2021 54.37 0-100 -1.6%
2022 53.21 0-100 -2.1%
2023 54.28 0-100 +2.0%
2024 50.88 0-100 -6.3%
2025 49.31 0-100 -3.1%

Maldives compared with similar countries

  • Maldives's 49.31 0-100 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 56.73 0-100, 87% of the median. (59 countries reporting)
  • Maldives's 49.31 0-100 is below the median for South Asia, which is 54.78 0-100, 90% of the median. (6 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 40.04 0-100 39.47 0-100 40.61 0-100 2
2000s 44.08 0-100 34.25 0-100 58.51 0-100 9
2010s 50.44 0-100 44.76 0-100 58.09 0-100 10
2020s 52.88 0-100 49.31 0-100 55.25 0-100 6

Countries ranked near Maldives

  1. 127 Georgia 51.14 0-100 compare
  2. 128 Serbia 50.12 0-100 compare
  3. 129 Macao 50.02 0-100 compare
  4. 131 Sierra Leone 49.16 0-100 compare
  5. 132 Thailand 48.23 0-100 compare
  6. 133 Hong Kong 48.13 0-100 compare

See the full ranking of 208 places →

More reference data data for Maldives

All data for Maldives →

Frequently asked questions

What is voice and accountability - governance score in Maldives?
Voice and accountability - governance score in Maldives was 49.31 0-100 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in Maldives?
The highest recorded value was 58.51 0-100 in 2009.
What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in Maldives?
The lowest recorded value was 34.25 0-100 in 2004.
How does Maldives rank for voice and accountability - governance score?
Maldives ranks 130th out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
Is voice and accountability - governance score rising or falling in Maldives?
Over the last ten years it is up 3.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Maldives data come from?
The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Maldives. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/maldives/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/maldives/">Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Maldives</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).