Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) in Hong Kong

Hong Kong: Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) was 48.13 0-100 in 2025. ▼ Falling

Latest (2025)
48.13 0-100
Change on year
down 1.3%
World rank
133rd
of 208 countries
All-time high
70.54 0-100
in 2011
All-time low
48.13 0-100
in 2025
Years of data
27
1996–2025

Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Hong Kong, 1996–2025

0204060801996201020251996: 62.5 0-1001998: 55.3 0-1002000: 56.8 0-1002002: 65.4 0-1002003: 66.3 0-1002004: 67.1 0-1002005: 69.5 0-1002006: 69.1 0-1002007: 69 0-1002008: 68.7 0-1002009: 68.6 0-1002010: 68.2 0-1002011: 70.5 0-1002012: 70.3 0-1002013: 69.5 0-1002014: 68.4 0-1002015: 68.4 0-1002016: 67.6 0-1002017: 67.6 0-1002018: 66.7 0-1002019: 63 0-1002020: 60.3 0-1002021: 53.5 0-1002022: 51.5 0-1002023: 49.7 0-1002024: 48.8 0-1002025: 48.1 0-100

Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 0-100.

Analysis

Hong Kong recorded 48.13 0-100 for voice and accountability - governance score in 2025. That is the lowest value across all 27 years on record.

The figure is down 1.3% on the previous year and down 29.6% over ten years.

Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance score in Hong Kong peaked at 70.54 0-100 in 2011 and was at its lowest, 48.13 0-100, in 2025.

That places Hong Kong 133rd out of 208 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 27 years of available data.

Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) in Hong Kong, year by year

Annual values for Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) in Hong Kong, 1996 to 2025.
Year 0-100 Change
1996 62.46 0-100 —
1998 55.27 0-100 -11.5%
2000 56.76 0-100 +2.7%
2002 65.37 0-100 +15.2%
2003 66.3 0-100 +1.4%
2004 67.11 0-100 +1.2%
2005 69.5 0-100 +3.6%
2006 69.09 0-100 -0.6%
2007 69.02 0-100 -0.1%
2008 68.69 0-100 -0.5%
2009 68.55 0-100 -0.2%
2010 68.19 0-100 -0.5%
2011 70.54 0-100 +3.5%
2012 70.28 0-100 -0.4%
2013 69.45 0-100 -1.2%
2014 68.37 0-100 -1.6%
2015 68.4 0-100 +0.0%
2016 67.63 0-100 -1.1%
2017 67.58 0-100 -0.1%
2018 66.71 0-100 -1.3%
2019 63 0-100 -5.6%
2020 60.34 0-100 -4.2%
2021 53.55 0-100 -11.3%
2022 51.47 0-100 -3.9%
2023 49.71 0-100 -3.4%
2024 48.78 0-100 -1.9%
2025 48.13 0-100 -1.3%

Hong Kong compared with similar countries

  • Hong Kong's 48.13 0-100 is below the median for high income countries, which is 76.46 0-100, 63% of the median. (76 countries reporting)
  • Hong Kong's 48.13 0-100 is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 63.85 0-100, 75% of the median. (36 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 58.86 0-100 55.27 0-100 62.46 0-100 2
2000s 66.71 0-100 56.76 0-100 69.5 0-100 9
2010s 68.01 0-100 63 0-100 70.54 0-100 10
2020s 52 0-100 48.13 0-100 60.34 0-100 6

Countries ranked near Hong Kong

  1. 130 Maldives 49.31 0-100 compare
  2. 131 Sierra Leone 49.16 0-100 compare
  3. 132 Thailand 48.23 0-100 compare
  4. 134 Cote d'Ivoire 47.76 0-100 compare
  5. 135 Lebanon 46.83 0-100 compare
  6. 136 Honduras 46.81 0-100 compare

See the full ranking of 208 places →

More reference data data for Hong Kong

All data for Hong Kong →

Frequently asked questions

What is voice and accountability - governance score in Hong Kong?
Voice and accountability - governance score in Hong Kong was 48.13 0-100 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in Hong Kong?
The highest recorded value was 70.54 0-100 in 2011.
What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in Hong Kong?
The lowest recorded value was 48.13 0-100 in 2025.
How does Hong Kong rank for voice and accountability - governance score?
Hong Kong ranks 133rd out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
Is voice and accountability - governance score rising or falling in Hong Kong?
Over the last ten years it is down 29.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Hong Kong data come from?
The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Hong Kong. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/hong-kong-sar-china/">Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Hong Kong</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).