Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) in South Korea

South Korea: Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) was 73.79 0-100 in 2025. ▲ Rising

Latest (2025)
73.79 0-100
Change on year
up 3.1%
World rank
50th
of 208 countries
All-time high
75.02 0-100
in 2021
All-time low
63.55 0-100
in 1996
Years of data
27
1996–2025

Voice and Accountability - Governance score in South Korea, 1996–2025

0204060801996201020251996: 63.6 0-1001998: 65 0-1002000: 65 0-1002002: 73 0-1002003: 73.3 0-1002004: 71.9 0-1002005: 73.2 0-1002006: 74.2 0-1002007: 74.4 0-1002008: 73.1 0-1002009: 74.9 0-1002010: 74.4 0-1002011: 73.8 0-1002012: 73.8 0-1002013: 72.7 0-1002014: 72.2 0-1002015: 70.9 0-1002016: 69.9 0-1002017: 73.4 0-1002018: 74.4 0-1002019: 73.8 0-1002020: 74.2 0-1002021: 75 0-1002022: 74.5 0-1002023: 73.5 0-1002024: 71.6 0-1002025: 73.8 0-100

Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 0-100.

Analysis

In 2025, voice and accountability - governance score in South Korea stood at 73.79 0-100.

That represents a change of up 3.1% on the previous year and up 4.1% over ten years.

Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance score in South Korea peaked at 75.02 0-100 in 2021 and was at its lowest, 63.55 0-100, in 1996.

South Korea ranks 50th of 208 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 27 years of available data.

Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) in South Korea, year by year

Annual values for Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) in South Korea, 1996 to 2025.
Year 0-100 Change
1996 63.55 0-100 —
1998 64.98 0-100 +2.2%
2000 65.04 0-100 +0.1%
2002 73.04 0-100 +12.3%
2003 73.27 0-100 +0.3%
2004 71.93 0-100 -1.8%
2005 73.19 0-100 +1.8%
2006 74.24 0-100 +1.4%
2007 74.38 0-100 +0.2%
2008 73.06 0-100 -1.8%
2009 74.88 0-100 +2.5%
2010 74.44 0-100 -0.6%
2011 73.8 0-100 -0.9%
2012 73.84 0-100 +0.1%
2013 72.68 0-100 -1.6%
2014 72.23 0-100 -0.6%
2015 70.87 0-100 -1.9%
2016 69.91 0-100 -1.3%
2017 73.36 0-100 +4.9%
2018 74.35 0-100 +1.3%
2019 73.75 0-100 -0.8%
2020 74.16 0-100 +0.5%
2021 75.02 0-100 +1.2%
2022 74.47 0-100 -0.7%
2023 73.51 0-100 -1.3%
2024 71.59 0-100 -2.6%
2025 73.79 0-100 +3.1%

South Korea compared with similar countries

  • South Korea's 73.79 0-100 is below the median for high income countries, which is 76.46 0-100, 97% of the median. (76 countries reporting)
  • South Korea's 73.79 0-100 is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 63.85 0-100, 1.2× the median. (36 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 64.27 0-100 63.55 0-100 64.98 0-100 2
2000s 72.56 0-100 65.04 0-100 74.88 0-100 9
2010s 72.92 0-100 69.91 0-100 74.44 0-100 10
2020s 73.76 0-100 71.59 0-100 75.02 0-100 6

Countries ranked near South Korea

  1. 47 Cyprus 74.23 0-100 compare
  2. 48 Cape Verde 73.88 0-100 compare
  3. 49 French Polynesia 73.82 0-100 compare
  4. 51 Greece 73.55 0-100 compare
  5. 52 Slovakia 73.28 0-100 compare
  6. 53 Poland 72.75 0-100 compare

See the full ranking of 208 places →

More reference data data for South Korea

All data for South Korea →

Frequently asked questions

What is voice and accountability - governance score in South Korea?
Voice and accountability - governance score in South Korea was 73.79 0-100 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in South Korea?
The highest recorded value was 75.02 0-100 in 2021.
What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in South Korea?
The lowest recorded value was 63.55 0-100 in 1996.
How does South Korea rank for voice and accountability - governance score?
South Korea ranks 50th out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
Is voice and accountability - governance score rising or falling in South Korea?
Over the last ten years it is up 4.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this South Korea data come from?
The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Voice and Accountability - Governance score in South Korea. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/korea-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/korea-rep/">Voice and Accountability - Governance score in South Korea</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).