Voice and Accountability - Governance score in South Korea

South Korea: Voice and Accountability - Governance score was 70.99 0-100 in 2024. ▲ Rising

Latest (2024)
70.99 0-100
Change on year
down 2.7%
World rank
53rd
of 207 countries
All-time high
74.21 0-100
in 2021
All-time low
67.35 0-100
in 1996
Years of data
26
1996–2024

Voice and Accountability - Governance score in South Korea, 1996–2024

0204060801996201020241996: 67.4 0-1001998: 68.9 0-1002000: 69 0-1002002: 70.6 0-1002003: 70.7 0-1002004: 68.5 0-1002005: 69.6 0-1002006: 71.5 0-1002007: 72 0-1002008: 70.2 0-1002009: 71.8 0-1002010: 72.2 0-1002011: 71.7 0-1002012: 71.9 0-1002013: 71.1 0-1002014: 70.7 0-1002015: 68.9 0-1002016: 69 0-1002017: 72.2 0-1002018: 72.7 0-1002019: 72.3 0-1002020: 73.4 0-1002021: 74.2 0-1002022: 73.4 0-1002023: 72.9 0-1002024: 71 0-100

Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 0-100.

Analysis

In 2024, voice and accountability - governance score in South Korea stood at 70.99 0-100.

That represents a change of down 2.7% on the previous year and up 0.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance score in South Korea peaked at 74.21 0-100 in 2021 and was at its lowest, 67.35 0-100, in 1996.

South Korea ranks 53rd of 207 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 26 years of available data.

Voice and Accountability - Governance score in South Korea, year by year

Annual values for Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) in South Korea, 1996 to 2024.
Year 0-100 Change
1996 67.35 0-100
1998 68.86 0-100 +2.2%
2000 69.05 0-100 +0.3%
2002 70.58 0-100 +2.2%
2003 70.73 0-100 +0.2%
2004 68.47 0-100 -3.2%
2005 69.59 0-100 +1.6%
2006 71.47 0-100 +2.7%
2007 72 0-100 +0.7%
2008 70.15 0-100 -2.6%
2009 71.85 0-100 +2.4%
2010 72.18 0-100 +0.5%
2011 71.65 0-100 -0.7%
2012 71.91 0-100 +0.4%
2013 71.06 0-100 -1.2%
2014 70.66 0-100 -0.6%
2015 68.95 0-100 -2.4%
2016 68.96 0-100 +0.0%
2017 72.16 0-100 +4.6%
2018 72.72 0-100 +0.8%
2019 72.33 0-100 -0.5%
2020 73.4 0-100 +1.5%
2021 74.21 0-100 +1.1%
2022 73.43 0-100 -1.0%
2023 72.94 0-100 -0.7%
2024 70.99 0-100 -2.7%

South Korea compared with similar countries

  • South Korea's 70.99 0-100 is below the median for high income countries, which is 73.61 0-100, 96% of the median. (75 countries reporting)
  • South Korea's 70.99 0-100 is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 62.78 0-100, 1.1× the median. (36 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 68.11 0-100 67.35 0-100 68.86 0-100 2
2000s 70.43 0-100 68.47 0-100 72 0-100 9
2010s 71.26 0-100 68.95 0-100 72.72 0-100 10
2020s 72.99 0-100 70.99 0-100 74.21 0-100 5

Countries ranked near South Korea

  1. 50 Monaco 71.5 0-100 compare
  2. 51 United States Virgin Islands 71.43 0-100 compare
  3. 52 Tonga 71.21 0-100 compare
  4. 54 Cape Verde 70.7 0-100 compare
  5. 55 Greece 70.53 0-100 compare
  6. 56 Poland 70.01 0-100 compare

See the full ranking of 207 places →

More reference data data for South Korea

All data for South Korea →

Frequently asked questions

What is voice and accountability - governance score in South Korea?
Voice and accountability - governance score in South Korea was 70.99 0-100 in 2024, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in South Korea?
The highest recorded value was 74.21 0-100 in 2021.
What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in South Korea?
The lowest recorded value was 67.35 0-100 in 1996.
How does South Korea rank for voice and accountability - governance score?
South Korea ranks 53rd out of 207 countries with data for 2024.
Is voice and accountability - governance score rising or falling in South Korea?
Over the last ten years it is up 0.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this South Korea data come from?
The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Voice and Accountability - Governance score in South Korea. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/korea-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/korea-rep/">Voice and Accountability - Governance score in South Korea</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
207 places, 5,285 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).