Cape Verde vs South Korea: Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) over time
- Cape Verde
- South Korea
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 73.88 0-100 against 73.79 0-100 in South Korea, a difference of 0.09 0-100.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Cape Verde ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 48th and South Korea ranks 50th of 208 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 3 and South Korea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | South Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 73.29 0-100 | 64.27 0-100 | 9.03 0-100 | Cape Verde |
| 2000s | 73.16 0-100 | 72.56 0-100 | 0.5987 0-100 | Cape Verde |
| 2010s | 74.75 0-100 | 72.92 0-100 | 1.83 0-100 | Cape Verde |
| 2020s | 73.44 0-100 | 73.76 0-100 | 0.3145 0-100 | South Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance score, Cape Verde or South Korea?
- Cape Verde, at 73.88 0-100 against 73.79 0-100 in South Korea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance score between Cape Verde and South Korea?
- 0.09 0-100, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and South Korea?
- 27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
- How do Cape Verde and South Korea rank globally for voice and accountability - governance score?
- Cape Verde ranks 48th and South Korea ranks 50th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).