Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) in Jordan

Jordan: Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) was 44.04 0-100 in 2025. ▼ Falling

Latest (2025)
44.04 0-100
Change on year
up 0.2%
World rank
142nd
of 208 countries
All-time high
48.4 0-100
in 2000
All-time low
42.88 0-100
in 2022
Years of data
27
1996–2025

Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Jordan, 1996–2025

010203040501996201020251996: 48 0-1001998: 45.6 0-1002000: 48.4 0-1002002: 44 0-1002003: 44.9 0-1002004: 45.6 0-1002005: 47 0-1002006: 46.9 0-1002007: 47.3 0-1002008: 46.5 0-1002009: 45.3 0-1002010: 44.4 0-1002011: 44.7 0-1002012: 45.5 0-1002013: 44.5 0-1002014: 45.6 0-1002015: 45.5 0-1002016: 45.9 0-1002017: 45.6 0-1002018: 44.9 0-1002019: 44.9 0-1002020: 43.9 0-1002021: 43.3 0-1002022: 42.9 0-1002023: 43.3 0-1002024: 44 0-1002025: 44 0-100

Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 0-100.

Analysis

Jordan recorded 44.04 0-100 for voice and accountability - governance score in 2025.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.2% on the previous year and down 3.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance score in Jordan peaked at 48.4 0-100 in 2000 and was at its lowest, 42.88 0-100, in 2022.

That places Jordan 142nd out of 208 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 27 years of available data.

Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) in Jordan, year by year

Annual values for Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) in Jordan, 1996 to 2025.
Year 0-100 Change
1996 47.99 0-100 —
1998 45.63 0-100 -4.9%
2000 48.4 0-100 +6.1%
2002 44.05 0-100 -9.0%
2003 44.92 0-100 +2.0%
2004 45.55 0-100 +1.4%
2005 47.05 0-100 +3.3%
2006 46.9 0-100 -0.3%
2007 47.31 0-100 +0.9%
2008 46.54 0-100 -1.6%
2009 45.25 0-100 -2.8%
2010 44.42 0-100 -1.8%
2011 44.72 0-100 +0.7%
2012 45.55 0-100 +1.8%
2013 44.47 0-100 -2.4%
2014 45.59 0-100 +2.5%
2015 45.55 0-100 -0.1%
2016 45.87 0-100 +0.7%
2017 45.65 0-100 -0.5%
2018 44.92 0-100 -1.6%
2019 44.95 0-100 +0.1%
2020 43.89 0-100 -2.3%
2021 43.34 0-100 -1.3%
2022 42.88 0-100 -1.1%
2023 43.31 0-100 +1.0%
2024 43.95 0-100 +1.5%
2025 44.04 0-100 +0.2%

Jordan compared with similar countries

  • Jordan's 44.04 0-100 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 56.73 0-100, 78% of the median. (59 countries reporting)
  • Jordan's 44.04 0-100 is above the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 37.02 0-100, 1.2× the median. (23 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 46.81 0-100 45.63 0-100 47.99 0-100 2
2000s 46.22 0-100 44.05 0-100 48.4 0-100 9
2010s 45.17 0-100 44.42 0-100 45.87 0-100 10
2020s 43.57 0-100 42.88 0-100 44.04 0-100 6

Countries ranked near Jordan

  1. 139 Nigeria 45.6 0-100 compare
  2. 140 Morocco 45.02 0-100 compare
  3. 141 Bangladesh 44.49 0-100 compare
  4. 143 El Salvador 44 0-100 compare
  5. 144 Rwanda 43.75 0-100 compare
  6. 145 Tanzania 43.3 0-100 compare

See the full ranking of 208 places →

More reference data data for Jordan

All data for Jordan →

Frequently asked questions

What is voice and accountability - governance score in Jordan?
Voice and accountability - governance score in Jordan was 44.04 0-100 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in Jordan?
The highest recorded value was 48.4 0-100 in 2000.
What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in Jordan?
The lowest recorded value was 42.88 0-100 in 2022.
How does Jordan rank for voice and accountability - governance score?
Jordan ranks 142nd out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
Is voice and accountability - governance score rising or falling in Jordan?
Over the last ten years it is down 3.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Jordan data come from?
The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Jordan. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/jordan/">Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Jordan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).