Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) in Bangladesh

Bangladesh: Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) was 44.49 0-100 in 2025. ▼ Falling

Latest (2025)
44.49 0-100
Change on year
up 12.8%
World rank
141st
of 208 countries
All-time high
54.55 0-100
in 2010
All-time low
38.49 0-100
in 2023
Years of data
27
1996–2025

Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Bangladesh, 1996–2025

02040601996201020251996: 52.5 0-1001998: 51.9 0-1002000: 50.1 0-1002002: 46.8 0-1002003: 46 0-1002004: 48.4 0-1002005: 49.5 0-1002006: 49.1 0-1002007: 49.4 0-1002008: 51.3 0-1002009: 54.3 0-1002010: 54.5 0-1002011: 53 0-1002012: 50 0-1002013: 48.2 0-1002014: 46.2 0-1002015: 44.8 0-1002016: 43.5 0-1002017: 42.9 0-1002018: 42.7 0-1002019: 42.3 0-1002020: 41.9 0-1002021: 40.7 0-1002022: 40 0-1002023: 38.5 0-1002024: 39.4 0-1002025: 44.5 0-100

Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in 0-100.

Analysis

The most recent figure for voice and accountability - governance score in Bangladesh is 44.49 0-100, measured in 2025.

The figure is up 12.8% on the previous year and down 0.8% over ten years.

Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance score in Bangladesh peaked at 54.55 0-100 in 2010 and was at its lowest, 38.49 0-100, in 2023.

Bangladesh ranks 141st of 208 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 27 years of available data.

Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) in Bangladesh, year by year

Annual values for Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100) in Bangladesh, 1996 to 2025.
Year 0-100 Change
1996 52.49 0-100 —
1998 51.94 0-100 -1.0%
2000 50.13 0-100 -3.5%
2002 46.79 0-100 -6.7%
2003 45.98 0-100 -1.7%
2004 48.4 0-100 +5.3%
2005 49.47 0-100 +2.2%
2006 49.13 0-100 -0.7%
2007 49.37 0-100 +0.5%
2008 51.31 0-100 +3.9%
2009 54.27 0-100 +5.8%
2010 54.55 0-100 +0.5%
2011 53.01 0-100 -2.8%
2012 49.96 0-100 -5.8%
2013 48.16 0-100 -3.6%
2014 46.22 0-100 -4.0%
2015 44.85 0-100 -3.0%
2016 43.49 0-100 -3.0%
2017 42.91 0-100 -1.3%
2018 42.67 0-100 -0.6%
2019 42.25 0-100 -1.0%
2020 41.87 0-100 -0.9%
2021 40.67 0-100 -2.9%
2022 39.96 0-100 -1.7%
2023 38.49 0-100 -3.7%
2024 39.43 0-100 +2.4%
2025 44.49 0-100 +12.8%

Bangladesh compared with similar countries

  • Bangladesh's 44.49 0-100 is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 44.49 0-100, 1.0× the median. (47 countries reporting)
  • Bangladesh's 44.49 0-100 is below the median for South Asia, which is 54.78 0-100, 81% of the median. (6 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 52.21 0-100 51.94 0-100 52.49 0-100 2
2000s 49.43 0-100 45.98 0-100 54.27 0-100 9
2010s 46.81 0-100 42.25 0-100 54.55 0-100 10
2020s 40.82 0-100 38.49 0-100 44.49 0-100 6

Countries ranked near Bangladesh

  1. 138 Tunisia 45.79 0-100 compare
  2. 139 Nigeria 45.6 0-100 compare
  3. 140 Morocco 45.02 0-100 compare
  4. 142 Jordan 44.04 0-100 compare
  5. 143 El Salvador 44 0-100 compare
  6. 144 Rwanda 43.75 0-100 compare

See the full ranking of 208 places →

More reference data data for Bangladesh

All data for Bangladesh →

Frequently asked questions

What is voice and accountability - governance score in Bangladesh?
Voice and accountability - governance score in Bangladesh was 44.49 0-100 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in Bangladesh?
The highest recorded value was 54.55 0-100 in 2010.
What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance score recorded in Bangladesh?
The lowest recorded value was 38.49 0-100 in 2023.
How does Bangladesh rank for voice and accountability - governance score?
Bangladesh ranks 141st out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
Is voice and accountability - governance score rising or falling in Bangladesh?
Over the last ten years it is down 0.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Bangladesh data come from?
The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Bangladesh. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/bangladesh/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/voice-and-accountability-governance-score-0-100/bangladesh/">Voice and Accountability - Governance score in Bangladesh</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).