Papua New Guinea vs Philippines: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Philippines
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports -0.3264 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.3554 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Philippines, a difference of 0.029 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Philippines ahead.
Papua New Guinea ranks 119th and Philippines ranks 122nd of 206 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Papua New Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Philippines in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.2326 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0967 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3292 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Philippines |
| 2000s | -0.2914 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0586 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2328 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Philippines |
| 2010s | -0.1539 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0787 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0752 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Philippines |
| 2020s | -0.1272 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3408 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2136 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Papua New Guinea or Philippines?
- Papua New Guinea, at -0.3264 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.3554 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Philippines as of 2024.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Papua New Guinea and Philippines?
- 0.029 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Philippines?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Philippines rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 119th and Philippines ranks 122nd of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.