Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in New Caledonia

New Caledonia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was 0.069 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2025)
0.069 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Change on year
down 6.7%
World rank
101st
of 208 countries
All-time high
1.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2020
All-time low
0.069 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Years of data
8
2018–2025

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in New Caledonia, 2018–2025

00.250.50.7511.22018202120252018: 0.837 approx. -2.5 to +2.52019: 1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.52020: 1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.52021: 1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.52022: 0.762 approx. -2.5 to +2.52023: 0.674 approx. -2.5 to +2.52024: 0.074 approx. -2.5 to +2.52025: 0.069 approx. -2.5 to +2.5

Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

Analysis

The most recent figure for voice and accountability - governance estimate in New Caledonia is 0.069 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, measured in 2025. That is the lowest value across all 8 years on record.

The figure is down 6.7% on the previous year and down 91.8% over ten years.

New Caledonia ranks 101st of 208 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in New Caledonia, year by year

Annual values for Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in New Caledonia, 2018 to 2025.
Year approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Change
2018 0.8374 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 —
2019 1.15 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 +37.1%
2020 1.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 +5.7%
2021 1.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -12.7%
2022 0.7621 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -28.0%
2023 0.6736 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -11.6%
2024 0.074 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -89.0%
2025 0.069 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -6.7%

New Caledonia compared with similar countries

  • New Caledonia's 0.069 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for high income countries, which is 1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 7% of the median. (76 countries reporting)
  • New Caledonia's 0.069 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 0.334 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 21% of the median. (36 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s 0.9926 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.8374 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.15 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 2
2020s 0.6418 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.069 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 6

Countries ranked near New Caledonia

  1. 98 Armenia 0.1208 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
  2. 99 Lesotho 0.1012 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
  3. 100 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 0.0778 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
  4. 102 Guyana 0.0628 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
  5. 103 Colombia 0.0426 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare
  6. 104 Liberia 0.0171 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 compare

See the full ranking of 208 places →

More reference data data for New Caledonia

All data for New Caledonia →

Frequently asked questions

What is voice and accountability - governance estimate in New Caledonia?
Voice and accountability - governance estimate in New Caledonia was 0.069 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
What is the highest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in New Caledonia?
The highest recorded value was 1.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2020.
What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in New Caledonia?
The lowest recorded value was 0.069 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025.
How does New Caledonia rank for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
New Caledonia ranks 101st out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
Is voice and accountability - governance estimate rising or falling in New Caledonia?
Over the last ten years it is down 91.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this New Caledonia data come from?
The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 8 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in New Caledonia. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/voice-and-accountability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/new-caledonia/">Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in New Caledonia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,514 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.