Colombia vs New Caledonia: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- Colombia
- New Caledonia
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 0.069 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.0426 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Colombia, a difference of 0.0264 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.6 times Colombia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2018 it was New Caledonia ahead.
Colombia ranks 103rd and New Caledonia ranks 101st of 208 countries.
New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.1213 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9926 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8713 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | New Caledonia |
| 2020s | 0.0895 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6418 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5523 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | New Caledonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher voice and accountability - governance estimate, Colombia or New Caledonia?
- New Caledonia, at 0.069 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.0426 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Colombia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in voice and accountability - governance estimate between Colombia and New Caledonia?
- 0.0264 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and New Caledonia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2025.
- How do Colombia and New Caledonia rank globally for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Colombia ranks 103rd and New Caledonia ranks 101st of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.