Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Democratic Republic of Congo
Democratic Republic of Congo: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▲ Rising
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Democratic Republic of Congo, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
In 2025, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Democratic Republic of Congo stood at -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The figure is down 1.7% on the previous year and up 6.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Democratic Republic of Congo peaked at -1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2007 and was at its lowest, -1.99 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 1998.
That places Democratic Republic of Congo 168th out of 208 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 27 years of available data.
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Democratic Republic of Congo, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -1.93 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -1.99 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.1% |
| 2000 | -1.92 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.6% |
| 2002 | -1.75 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -9.0% |
| 2003 | -1.61 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -7.9% |
| 2004 | -1.59 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.5% |
| 2005 | -1.47 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -7.5% |
| 2006 | -1.14 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -22.0% |
| 2007 | -1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.5% |
| 2008 | -1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +12.7% |
| 2009 | -1.3 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.0% |
| 2010 | -1.32 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.2% |
| 2011 | -1.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +7.7% |
| 2012 | -1.4 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.0% |
| 2013 | -1.39 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7% |
| 2014 | -1.28 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -7.5% |
| 2015 | -1.29 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.8% |
| 2016 | -1.41 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +8.8% |
| 2017 | -1.49 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +6.0% |
| 2018 | -1.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -5.1% |
| 2019 | -1.23 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -13.0% |
| 2020 | -1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -5.0% |
| 2021 | -1.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.3% |
| 2022 | -1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9% |
| 2023 | -1.16 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.4% |
| 2024 | -1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.1% |
| 2025 | -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.7% |
Democratic Republic of Congo compared with similar countries
- Democratic Republic of Congo's -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for low income countries, which is -1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 96% of the median. (25 countries reporting)
- Democratic Republic of Congo's -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is -0.9016 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.3× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1.96 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.99 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.93 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -1.46 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.92 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -1.37 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.49 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.23 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.16 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Democratic Republic of Congo
More reference data data for Democratic Republic of Congo
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.3528 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.56 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.31 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.335 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.31 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.18 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.44 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 6.66 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 11.56 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.82 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is voice and accountability - governance estimate in Democratic Republic of Congo?
- Voice and accountability - governance estimate in Democratic Republic of Congo was -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Democratic Republic of Congo?
- The highest recorded value was -1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2007.
- What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Democratic Republic of Congo?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.99 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 1998.
- How does Democratic Republic of Congo rank for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 168th out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
- Is voice and accountability - governance estimate rising or falling in Democratic Republic of Congo?
- Over the last ten years it is up 6.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Democratic Republic of Congo data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.