Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Azerbaijan
Azerbaijan: Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was -1.53 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▼ Falling
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate in Azerbaijan, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
In 2025, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Azerbaijan stood at -1.53 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
That represents a change of up 2.3% on the previous year and down 26.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, voice and accountability - governance estimate in Azerbaijan peaked at -0.9351 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2009 and was at its lowest, -1.57 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2023.
Azerbaijan ranks 185th of 208 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 27 years of available data.
Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Azerbaijan, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -1.23 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -5.3% |
| 2000 | -1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.4% |
| 2002 | -1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -11.0% |
| 2003 | -1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.2% |
| 2004 | -1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.8% |
| 2005 | -1.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.2% |
| 2006 | -0.989 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -6.3% |
| 2007 | -0.9628 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.6% |
| 2008 | -0.9712 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.9% |
| 2009 | -0.9351 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.7% |
| 2010 | -1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +8.3% |
| 2011 | -1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.1% |
| 2012 | -1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5% |
| 2013 | -1.15 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +14.2% |
| 2014 | -1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.0% |
| 2015 | -1.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.6% |
| 2016 | -1.24 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.8% |
| 2017 | -1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.8% |
| 2018 | -1.28 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.5% |
| 2019 | -1.51 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +17.7% |
| 2020 | -1.5 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5% |
| 2021 | -1.49 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5% |
| 2022 | -1.49 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.2% |
| 2023 | -1.57 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.8% |
| 2024 | -1.56 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3% |
| 2025 | -1.53 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.3% |
Azerbaijan compared with similar countries
- Azerbaijan's -1.53 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is -0.0542 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 28.1× the median. (59 countries reporting)
- Azerbaijan's -1.53 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.881 approx. -2.5 to +2.5. (54 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.23 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9351 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.51 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -1.52 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.57 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.49 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Azerbaijan
More reference data data for Azerbaijan
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1322 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.94 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.34 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1063 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.34 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.4434 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.1605 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 9.23 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 11.11 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.5787 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is voice and accountability - governance estimate in Azerbaijan?
- Voice and accountability - governance estimate in Azerbaijan was -1.53 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Azerbaijan?
- The highest recorded value was -0.9351 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2009.
- What is the lowest voice and accountability - governance estimate recorded in Azerbaijan?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.57 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2023.
- How does Azerbaijan rank for voice and accountability - governance estimate?
- Azerbaijan ranks 185th out of 208 countries with data for 2025.
- Is voice and accountability - governance estimate rising or falling in Azerbaijan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 26.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Azerbaijan data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Voice and Accountability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Voice and Accountability (VA) captures perceptions of the extent to which citizens can participate in selecting their government including electoral integrity, and of accountability mechanisms for citizens—reflected in the ability to access information, governmental oversight bodies, and a robust traditional/digital media landscape. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.