Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands

Turks and Caicos Islands: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre was 0.0051 hectares per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
0.0051 hectares per square kilometre
Change on year
up 33.3%
World rank
36th
of 176 countries
All-time high
0.0481 hectares per square kilometre
in 2008
All-time low
0.003 hectares per square kilometre
in 2006
Years of data
23
2001–2023

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands, 2001–2023

00.010.020.030.040.052001201220232001: 0.007 hectares per square kilometre2002: 0.005 hectares per square kilometre2003: 0.008 hectares per square kilometre2004: 0.007 hectares per square kilometre2005: 0.016 hectares per square kilometre2006: 0.003 hectares per square kilometre2007: 0.04 hectares per square kilometre2008: 0.048 hectares per square kilometre2009: 0.033 hectares per square kilometre2010: 0.028 hectares per square kilometre2011: 0.005 hectares per square kilometre2012: 0.006 hectares per square kilometre2013: 0.007 hectares per square kilometre2014: 0.012 hectares per square kilometre2015: 0.005 hectares per square kilometre2016: 0.006 hectares per square kilometre2017: 0.009 hectares per square kilometre2018: 0.005 hectares per square kilometre2019: 0.004 hectares per square kilometre2020: 0.01 hectares per square kilometre2021: 0.007 hectares per square kilometre2022: 0.004 hectares per square kilometre2023: 0.005 hectares per square kilometre

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in hectares per square kilometre.

Analysis

In 2023, tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands stood at 0.0051 hectares per square kilometre.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 33.3% on the previous year and down 25.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands peaked at 0.0481 hectares per square kilometre in 2008 and was at its lowest, 0.003 hectares per square kilometre, in 2006.

Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 36th of 176 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands, year by year

Annual values for Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands, 2001 to 2023.
Year hectares per square kilometre Change
2001 0.0068 hectares per square kilometre —
2002 0.0047 hectares per square kilometre -31.1%
2003 0.0078 hectares per square kilometre +66.1%
2004 0.007 hectares per square kilometre -9.7%
2005 0.0163 hectares per square kilometre +133.4%
2006 0.003 hectares per square kilometre -81.6%
2007 0.0401 hectares per square kilometre +1232.6%
2008 0.0481 hectares per square kilometre +19.9%
2009 0.033 hectares per square kilometre -31.4%
2010 0.0281 hectares per square kilometre -14.8%
2011 0.0051 hectares per square kilometre -81.8%
2012 0.0056 hectares per square kilometre +8.8%
2013 0.0069 hectares per square kilometre +22.9%
2014 0.0119 hectares per square kilometre +73.6%
2015 0.0048 hectares per square kilometre -59.5%
2016 0.0057 hectares per square kilometre +18.8%
2017 0.0092 hectares per square kilometre +60.5%
2018 0.0054 hectares per square kilometre -41.0%
2019 0.0044 hectares per square kilometre -19.4%
2020 0.0102 hectares per square kilometre +132.7%
2021 0.0069 hectares per square kilometre -31.8%
2022 0.0038 hectares per square kilometre -44.6%
2023 0.0051 hectares per square kilometre +33.3%

Biggest year-on-year movements

Years where Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.

YearChange FromTo
2007 +1232.6% 0.003 hectares per square kilometre 0.0401 hectares per square kilometre

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 0.0185 hectares per square kilometre 0.003 hectares per square kilometre 0.0481 hectares per square kilometre 9
2010s 0.0087 hectares per square kilometre 0.0044 hectares per square kilometre 0.0281 hectares per square kilometre 10
2020s 0.0065 hectares per square kilometre 0.0038 hectares per square kilometre 0.0102 hectares per square kilometre 4

Countries ranked near Turks and Caicos Islands

  1. 33 Japan 0.0059 hectares per square kilometre compare
  2. 34 Barbados 0.0056 hectares per square kilometre compare
  3. 35 United States 0.0054 hectares per square kilometre compare
  4. 37 Portugal 0.005 hectares per square kilometre compare
  5. 38 Croatia 0.0047 hectares per square kilometre compare
  6. 39 Finland 0.0045 hectares per square kilometre compare

See the full ranking of 176 places →

More reference data data for Turks and Caicos Islands

All data for Turks and Caicos Islands →

Frequently asked questions

What is tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands?
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands was 0.0051 hectares per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre recorded in Turks and Caicos Islands?
The highest recorded value was 0.0481 hectares per square kilometre in 2008.
What is the lowest tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre recorded in Turks and Caicos Islands?
The lowest recorded value was 0.003 hectares per square kilometre in 2006.
How does Turks and Caicos Islands rank for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre?
Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 36th out of 176 countries with data for 2023.
Is tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre rising or falling in Turks and Caicos Islands?
Over the last ten years it is down 25.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Turks and Caicos Islands data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 23 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Tree cover loss by dominant driver ÷ Land area (sq. km)

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre
Unit
hectares per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
176 places, 3,776 data points, 2001–2023
Last refreshed

Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.