Barbados vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre

Barbados
0.0056 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
0.0051 hectares per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
34th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
36th

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre over time

  • Barbados
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
00.010.020.030.040.05200120122023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 0.0056 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0051 hectares per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0.0005 hectares per square kilometre.

That makes Barbados's figure about 1.1 times Turks and Caicos Islands's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.

Barbados ranks 34th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 36th of 176 countries.

Turks and Caicos Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0061 hectares per square kilometre 0.0185 hectares per square kilometre 0.0124 hectares per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2010s 0.0071 hectares per square kilometre 0.0084 hectares per square kilometre 0.0013 hectares per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2020s 0.004 hectares per square kilometre 0.0053 hectares per square kilometre 0.0013 hectares per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre, Barbados or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Barbados, at 0.0056 hectares per square kilometre against 0.0051 hectares per square kilometre in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre between Barbados and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.0005 hectares per square kilometre, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Turks and Caicos Islands?
21 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre?
Barbados ranks 34th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 36th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/barbados/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-per-square-kilometre/barbados/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Barbados vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, per square kilometre
Unit
hectares per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
176 places, 3,776 data points, 2001–2023
Last refreshed

Tree cover loss by dominant driver divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.