Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled in Ecuador

Ecuador: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled was 265.21 hectares in 2024. ▼ Falling

Latest (2024)
265.21 hectares
Change on year
up 31.9%
World rank
53rd
of 186 countries
All-time high
660.02 hectares
in 2012
All-time low
113.05 hectares
in 2021
Years of data
24
2001–2024

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled in Ecuador, 2001–2024

2004006002001201220242001: 306.2 hectares2002: 263 hectares2003: 211.1 hectares2004: 527.2 hectares2005: 387.8 hectares2006: 464.8 hectares2007: 491.4 hectares2008: 498.2 hectares2009: 484.5 hectares2010: 348.9 hectares2011: 361.6 hectares2012: 660 hectares2013: 360.5 hectares2014: 214.4 hectares2015: 165.6 hectares2016: 189.5 hectares2017: 274 hectares2018: 141.1 hectares2019: 134.8 hectares2020: 172.3 hectares2021: 113 hectares2022: 234.8 hectares2023: 201.1 hectares2024: 265.2 hectares

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in hectares.

Analysis

In 2024, tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled in Ecuador stood at 265.21 hectares.

That represents a change of up 31.9% on the previous year and up 23.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled in Ecuador peaked at 660.02 hectares in 2012 and was at its lowest, 113.05 hectares, in 2021.

That places Ecuador 53rd out of 186 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 24 years of available data.

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled in Ecuador, year by year

Annual values for Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled in Ecuador, 2001 to 2024.
Year hectares Change
2001 306.24 hectares —
2002 263.02 hectares -14.1%
2003 211.07 hectares -19.8%
2004 527.16 hectares +149.8%
2005 387.8 hectares -26.4%
2006 464.81 hectares +19.9%
2007 491.42 hectares +5.7%
2008 498.16 hectares +1.4%
2009 484.53 hectares -2.7%
2010 348.92 hectares -28.0%
2011 361.64 hectares +3.6%
2012 660.02 hectares +82.5%
2013 360.45 hectares -45.4%
2014 214.42 hectares -40.5%
2015 165.56 hectares -22.8%
2016 189.47 hectares +14.4%
2017 273.95 hectares +44.6%
2018 141.11 hectares -48.5%
2019 134.8 hectares -4.5%
2020 172.25 hectares +27.8%
2021 113.05 hectares -34.4%
2022 234.84 hectares +107.7%
2023 201.06 hectares -14.4%
2024 265.21 hectares +31.9%

Ecuador compared with similar countries

  • Ecuador's 265.21 hectares is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 135.51 hectares, 2.0× the median. (50 countries reporting)
  • Ecuador's 265.21 hectares is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 105.54 hectares, 2.5× the median. (41 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 403.8 hectares 211.07 hectares 527.16 hectares 9
2010s 285.04 hectares 134.8 hectares 660.02 hectares 10
2020s 197.28 hectares 113.05 hectares 265.21 hectares 5

Countries ranked near Ecuador

  1. 50 Austria 303.85 hectares compare
  2. 51 Paraguay 292.7 hectares compare
  3. 52 Colombia 274.67 hectares compare
  4. 54 Ukraine 257.67 hectares compare
  5. 55 Honduras 254.55 hectares compare
  6. 56 Bolivia 246.49 hectares compare

See the full ranking of 186 places →

More reference data data for Ecuador

All data for Ecuador →

Frequently asked questions

What is tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled in Ecuador?
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled in Ecuador was 265.21 hectares in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled recorded in Ecuador?
The highest recorded value was 660.02 hectares in 2012.
What is the lowest tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled recorded in Ecuador?
The lowest recorded value was 113.05 hectares in 2021.
How does Ecuador rank for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?
Ecuador ranks 53rd out of 186 countries with data for 2024.
Is tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled rising or falling in Ecuador?
Over the last ten years it is up 23.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Ecuador data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 24 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled in Ecuador. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-gaps-filled/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/tree-cover-loss-by-dominant-driver-gaps-filled/ecuador/">Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled in Ecuador</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Unit
hectares
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
186 places, 4,306 data points, 2001–2024
Last refreshed

Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.