Bolivia vs Ecuador: Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled
Bolivia
246.49 hectares
in 2024
Ecuador
265.21 hectares
in 2024
Bolivia rank
56th
Ecuador rank
53rd
Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled over time
- Bolivia
- Ecuador
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 265.21 hectares against 246.49 hectares in Bolivia, a difference of 18.72 hectares.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Bolivia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Bolivia ahead.
Bolivia ranks 56th and Ecuador ranks 53rd of 186 countries.
Bolivia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 729.99 hectares | 403.8 hectares | 326.18 hectares | Bolivia |
| 2010s | 724.01 hectares | 285.04 hectares | 438.98 hectares | Bolivia |
| 2020s | 274.97 hectares | 197.28 hectares | 77.69 hectares | Bolivia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled, Bolivia or Ecuador?
- Ecuador, at 265.21 hectares against 246.49 hectares in Bolivia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled between Bolivia and Ecuador?
- 18.72 hectares, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Ecuador?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Bolivia and Ecuador rank globally for tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled?
- Bolivia ranks 56th and Ecuador ranks 53rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tree cover loss by dominant driver, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tree cover loss by dominant driver with 111 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.