Is trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 rising or falling in Guyana?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Guyana data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 in Guyana

Name: Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 in Guyana
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Guyana: Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 was 70.25 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

70.25

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

131st

of 188 countries

All-time high

70.25

in 2014

All-time low

70.25

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 in Guyana, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Guyana recorded 70.25 for trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

That places Guyana 131st out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Guyana

128 Barbados 71.33 compare
129 Benin 70.97 compare
130 Haiti 70.61 compare
131 Gabon 70.25 compare
131 Guinea-Bissau 70.25 compare
131 Marshall Islands 70.25 compare
131 Palau 70.25 compare
131 Samoa 70.25 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Guyana

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.4179 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.05 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0457 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.2193 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0791 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0396 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0297 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.2193 (2050)
Summer temperature anomalies 0.5186 °C (2026)
Spring temperature anomalies 0.1147 °C (2026)

All data for Guyana →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 in Guyana?: Trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 in Guyana was 70.25 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 recorded in Guyana?: The highest recorded value was 70.25 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 recorded in Guyana?: The lowest recorded value was 70.25 in 2014.
How does Guyana rank for trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1?: Guyana ranks 131st out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 rising or falling in Guyana?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Guyana data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the time for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.