Is trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 rising or falling in Grenada?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Grenada data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 in Grenada

Name: Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 in Grenada
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Grenada: Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 was 86.98 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

86.98

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

77th

of 188 countries

All-time high

86.98

in 2014

All-time low

86.98

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 in Grenada, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 in Grenada is 86.98, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

Grenada ranks 77th of 188 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Grenada

74 El Salvador 87.46 compare
74 Malaysia 87.46 compare
76 Saint Kitts and Nevis 87.05 compare
78 Australia 86.38 compare
78 Oman 86.38 compare
80 Dominica 86.28 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Grenada

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural Soil 7.85 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture 0.5319 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Manure Management 0.0372 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.007 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0219 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0034 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0001 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop re 0.0098 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 8.77 (2050)

All data for Grenada →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 in Grenada?: Trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 in Grenada was 86.98 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 recorded in Grenada?: The highest recorded value was 86.98 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 recorded in Grenada?: The lowest recorded value was 86.98 in 2014.
How does Grenada rank for trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1?: Grenada ranks 77th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 rising or falling in Grenada?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Grenada data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the time for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.