Grenada vs Malaysia: Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB1

Grenada
86.98
in 2019
Malaysia
87.46
in 2019
Grenada rank
77th
Malaysia rank
74th

Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 over time

  • Grenada
  • Malaysia
020406080201420162019

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 87.46 against 86.98 in Grenada, a difference of 0.48.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Grenada ahead.

Grenada ranks 77th and Malaysia ranks 74th of 188 countries.

Grenada has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1, Grenada or Malaysia?
Malaysia, at 87.46 against 86.98 in Grenada as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 between Grenada and Malaysia?
0.48, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Malaysia?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Grenada and Malaysia rank globally for trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1?
Grenada ranks 77th and Malaysia ranks 74th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the time for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.