Is trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 rising or falling in Bolivia?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Bolivia data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 in Bolivia

Name: Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 in Bolivia
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Bolivia: Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 was 59.5 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

59.5

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

154th

of 188 countries

All-time high

59.5

in 2014

All-time low

59.5

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 in Bolivia, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Bolivia recorded 59.5 for trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

Bolivia ranks 154th of 188 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Countries ranked near Bolivia

151 Solomon Islands 61.65 compare
152 Uzbekistan 60.71 compare
153 Colombia 60.22 compare
155 Pakistan 57.35 compare
155 Philippines 57.35 compare
155 Sierra Leone 57.35 compare
155 Zambia 57.35 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Bolivia

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.7329 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 3.91 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.22 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3892 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 5.22 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.46 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.33 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 18.39 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 25.12 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.12 (2050)

All data for Bolivia →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 in Bolivia?: Trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 in Bolivia was 59.5 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 recorded in Bolivia?: The highest recorded value was 59.5 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 recorded in Bolivia?: The lowest recorded value was 59.5 in 2014.
How does Bolivia rank for trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1?: Bolivia ranks 154th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) (db1 rising or falling in Bolivia?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Bolivia data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the time for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.