Bolivia, Plurinational State of vs Solomon Islands: Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours)
Bolivia, Plurinational State of
59.5
in 2019
Solomon Islands
61.65
in 2019
Bolivia, Plurinational State of rank
155th
Solomon Islands rank
152nd
Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) over time
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 61.65 against 59.5 in Bolivia, Plurinational State of, a difference of 2.15.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Solomon Islands has been ahead every year.
Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 155th and Solomon Islands ranks 152nd of 190 countries.
Solomon Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours), Bolivia, Plurinational State of or Solomon Islands?
- Solomon Islands, at 61.65 against 59.5 in Bolivia, Plurinational State of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours) between Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Solomon Islands?
- 2.15, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Solomon Islands?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Solomon Islands rank globally for trading across borders: time to import: border compliance (hours)?
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 155th and Solomon Islands ranks 152nd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to import: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.