Is trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours) rising or falling in Tanzania?

Over the last ten years it is up 48.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.

Where does this Tanzania data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) in Tanzania

Name: Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) in Tanzania
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Tanzania: Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) was 43.79 in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)

43.79

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

161st

of 188 countries

All-time high

43.79

in 2015

All-time low

29.59

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) in Tanzania, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours) in Tanzania is 43.79, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

That represents a change of up 48.0% over ten years.

Tanzania ranks 161st of 188 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Countries ranked near Tanzania

158 Egypt 48.52 compare
159 Ghana 47.73 compare
160 Namibia 47.34 compare
161 Angola 43.79 compare
161 Uzbekistan 43.79 compare
161 Zambia 43.79 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Tanzania

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.6405 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 11.44 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 14.14 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.7582 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 14.14 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.15 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.26 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 59.37 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 72.45 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 4.13 (2050)

All data for Tanzania →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours) in Tanzania?: Trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours) in Tanzania was 43.79 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours) recorded in Tanzania?: The highest recorded value was 43.79 in 2015.
What is the lowest trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours) recorded in Tanzania?: The lowest recorded value was 29.59 in 2014.
How does Tanzania rank for trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours)?: Tanzania ranks 161st out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours) rising or falling in Tanzania?: Over the last ten years it is up 48.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Tanzania data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the time for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.