Egypt, Arab Republic of vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance
Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance over time
- Egypt, Arab Republic of
- Tanzania, United Republic of
How they compare
Egypt, Arab Republic of currently reports 48.52 against 43.79 in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 4.73.
That makes Egypt, Arab Republic of's figure about 1.1 times Tanzania, United Republic of's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Egypt, Arab Republic of has been ahead every year.
Egypt, Arab Republic of ranks 160th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 163rd of 190 countries.
Egypt, Arab Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance, Egypt, Arab Republic of or Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Egypt, Arab Republic of, at 48.52 against 43.79 in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance between Egypt, Arab Republic of and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 4.73, with Egypt, Arab Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt, Arab Republic of and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Egypt, Arab Republic of and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance?
- Egypt, Arab Republic of ranks 160th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 163rd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.