Is trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours) rising or falling in Guinea?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Guinea data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) in Guinea

Name: Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) in Guinea
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Guinea: Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) was 18.52 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

18.52

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

171st

of 188 countries

All-time high

18.52

in 2014

All-time low

18.52

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) in Guinea, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours) in Guinea is 18.52, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

Guinea ranks 171st of 188 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Countries ranked near Guinea

169 Kazakhstan 24.85 compare
170 Cambodia 22.49 compare
172 Bolivia 15.38 compare
172 Liberia 15.38 compare
172 Myanmar 15.38 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Guinea

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 3.05 (2050)
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 10.81 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture 386.84 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Manure Management 9.39 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 15,072 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Enteric Fermentation 7,415 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure left on Pa 3,544 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure Management 59.42 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Agricultural Soils 4,157 (2050)
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 12.63 (2050)

All data for Guinea →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours) in Guinea?: Trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours) in Guinea was 18.52 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours) recorded in Guinea?: The highest recorded value was 18.52 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours) recorded in Guinea?: The lowest recorded value was 18.52 in 2014.
How does Guinea rank for trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours)?: Guinea ranks 171st out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours) rising or falling in Guinea?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Guinea data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the time for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.