Guinea vs Myanmar: Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours)

Guinea
18.52
in 2019
Myanmar
15.38
in 2019
Guinea rank
171st
Myanmar rank
172nd

Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) over time

  • Guinea
  • Myanmar
05101520201420162019

How they compare

Guinea currently reports 18.52 against 15.38 in Myanmar, a difference of 3.14.

That makes Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Myanmar's.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Guinea has been ahead every year.

Guinea ranks 171st and Myanmar ranks 172nd of 188 countries.

Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours), Guinea or Myanmar?
Guinea, at 18.52 against 15.38 in Myanmar as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours) between Guinea and Myanmar?
3.14, with Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Myanmar?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Guinea and Myanmar rank globally for trading across borders: time to export: documentary compliance (hours)?
Guinea ranks 171st and Myanmar ranks 172nd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to export: Documentary compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the time for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.