Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol in South Africa

South Africa: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol was 69.23 in 2014. ▲ Rising

Latest (2014)
69.23
Change on year
unchanged
Rank
49th
of 181 groups
All-time high
69.23
in 2012
All-time low
61.54
in 2005
Years of data
10
2005–2014

Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol in South Africa, 2005–2014

02040602005200920142005: 61.52006: 61.52007: 61.52008: 61.52009: 61.52010: 61.52011: 61.52012: 69.22013: 69.22014: 69.2

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol in South Africa is 69.23, measured in 2014. That is the highest value across all 10 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 12.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol in South Africa peaked at 69.23 in 2012 and was at its lowest, 61.54, in 2005.

That places South Africa 49th out of 181 groups with data for 2014, putting it in the middle of the range.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 61.54 61.54 61.54 5
2010s 66.15 61.54 69.23 5

Countries ranked near South Africa

  1. 49 Bolivia 69.23 compare
  2. 49 Botswana 69.23 compare
  3. 49 Colombia 69.23 compare
  4. 49 Czechia 69.23 compare
  5. 49 Ecuador 69.23 compare
  6. 49 Equatorial Guinea 69.23 compare
  7. 49 Eswatini 69.23 compare
  8. 49 Gambia 69.23 compare
  9. 49 Greece 69.23 compare
  10. 49 Grenada 69.23 compare
  11. 49 Guatemala 69.23 compare
  12. 49 Guinea-Bissau 69.23 compare
  13. 49 Honduras 69.23 compare
  14. 49 Hungary 69.23 compare
  15. 49 Kiribati 69.23 compare
  16. 49 Micronesia (country) 69.23 compare
  17. 49 Morocco 69.23 compare
  18. 49 New Zealand 69.23 compare
  19. 49 Romania 69.23 compare
  20. 49 Samoa 69.23 compare
  21. 49 Sao Tome and Principe 69.23 compare
  22. 49 Senegal 69.23 compare
  23. 49 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 69.23 compare
  24. 49 Suriname 69.23 compare
  25. 49 Taiwan 69.23 compare
  26. 49 Tonga 69.23 compare
  27. 49 Tunisia 69.23 compare
  28. 49 Palestine 69.23 compare

See the full ranking of 183 places →

More reference data data for South Africa

All data for South Africa →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol in South Africa?
Trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol in South Africa was 69.23 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol recorded in South Africa?
The highest recorded value was 69.23 in 2012.
What is the lowest trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol recorded in South Africa?
The lowest recorded value was 61.54 in 2005.
How does South Africa rank for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol?
South Africa ranks 49th out of 181 groups with data for 2014.
Is trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol rising or falling in South Africa?
Over the last ten years it is up 12.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this South Africa data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.