New Zealand vs South Africa: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15)
New Zealand
69.23
in 2014
South Africa
69.23
in 2014
New Zealand rank
50th
South Africa rank
50th
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15) over time
- New Zealand
- South Africa
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 69.23 against 69.23 in South Africa, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was New Zealand ahead.
New Zealand ranks 50th and South Africa ranks 50th of 184 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 69.23 | 61.54 | 7.69 | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 69.23 | 66.15 | 3.08 | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15), New Zealand or South Africa?
- New Zealand, at 69.23 against 69.23 in South Africa as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15) between New Zealand and South Africa?
- 0, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and South Africa?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do New Zealand and South Africa rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15)?
- New Zealand ranks 50th and South Africa ranks 50th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.