Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) … import Score in Rwanda
Rwanda: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) … import Score was 46.15 in 2014. ◆ Volatile
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15) in Rwanda, 2005–2014
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
In 2014, trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15) in Rwanda stood at 46.15. That is the highest value across all 10 years on record.
The figure is up 20.0% over five years.
Over the whole period, trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15) in Rwanda peaked at 46.15 in 2010 and was at its lowest, 0, in 2005.
That places Rwanda 130th out of 184 countries with data for 2014, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) … import Score in Rwanda, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 0 | — |
| 2006 | 0 | — |
| 2007 | 38.46 | — |
| 2008 | 30.77 | -20.0% |
| 2009 | 38.46 | +25.0% |
| 2010 | 46.15 | +20.0% |
| 2011 | 46.15 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 46.15 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 46.15 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 46.15 | +0.0% |
Rwanda compared with similar countries
- Rwanda's 46.15 is above the median for low income countries, which is 38.46, 1.2× the median. (22 countries reporting)
- Rwanda's 46.15 is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 53.85, 86% of the median. (46 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21.54 | 0 | 38.46 | 5 |
| 2010s | 46.15 | 46.15 | 46.15 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Rwanda
- 130 Bangladesh 46.15 compare
- 130 Algeria 46.15 compare
- 130 Angola 46.15 compare
- 130 Burundi 46.15 compare
- 130 Cambodia 46.15 compare
- 130 Fiji 46.15 compare
- 130 Haiti 46.15 compare
- 130 Kenya 46.15 compare
- 130 Madagascar 46.15 compare
- 130 Maldives 46.15 compare
- 130 Mozambique 46.15 compare
- 130 Palau 46.15 compare
- 130 Papua New Guinea 46.15 compare
- 130 Paraguay 46.15 compare
- 130 Syria 46.15 compare
- 130 Ukraine 46.15 compare
- 130 Venezuela 46.15 compare
- 130 Yemen 46.15 compare
More reference data data for Rwanda
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2282 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.9517 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.38 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1223 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.38 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.7651 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.9517 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 4.27 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 6.98 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.666 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15) in Rwanda?
- Trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15) in Rwanda was 46.15 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15) recorded in Rwanda?
- The highest recorded value was 46.15 in 2010.
- What is the lowest trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15) recorded in Rwanda?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 in 2005.
- How does Rwanda rank for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15)?
- Rwanda ranks 130th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
- Where does this Rwanda data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.