Rwanda vs Syria: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol

Rwanda
46.15
in 2014
Syria
46.15
in 2014
Rwanda rank
127th
Syria rank
127th

Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time

  • Rwanda
  • Syria
01020304050200520092014

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 46.15 against 46.15 in Syria, a difference of 0.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Syria has been ahead every year.

Rwanda ranks 127th and Syria ranks 127th of 181 countries.

Syria has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Syria Difference Ahead
2000s 21.54 46.15 24.62 Syria
2010s 46.15 46.15 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol, Rwanda or Syria?
Rwanda, at 46.15 against 46.15 in Syria as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol between Rwanda and Syria?
0, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Syria?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Rwanda and Syria rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15 methodol?
Rwanda ranks 127th and Syria ranks 127th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.