Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15) in Egypt
Egypt: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15) was 38.46 in 2014. ▲ Rising
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15) in Egypt, 2005–2014
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
In 2014, trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15) in Egypt stood at 38.46. That is the highest value across all 10 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 25.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15) in Egypt peaked at 38.46 in 2006 and was at its lowest, 30.77, in 2005.
That places Egypt 149th out of 184 countries with data for 2014, putting it in the bottom quarter.
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15) in Egypt, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 30.77 | — |
| 2006 | 38.46 | +25.0% |
| 2007 | 38.46 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 38.46 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 38.46 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 38.46 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 38.46 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 38.46 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 38.46 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 38.46 | +0.0% |
Egypt compared with similar countries
- Egypt's 38.46 is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 53.85, 71% of the median. (46 countries reporting)
- Egypt's 38.46 is below the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 53.85, 71% of the median. (21 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 36.92 | 30.77 | 38.46 | 5 |
| 2010s | 38.46 | 38.46 | 38.46 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Egypt
- 149 India 38.46 compare
- 149 Russia 38.46 compare
- 149 Afghanistan 38.46 compare
- 149 Belarus 38.46 compare
- 149 Democratic Republic of Congo 38.46 compare
- 149 Congo 38.46 compare
- 149 Iraq 38.46 compare
- 149 Kuwait 38.46 compare
- 149 Laos 38.46 compare
- 149 Niger 38.46 compare
- 149 Trinidad and Tobago 38.46 compare
- 149 Uganda 38.46 compare
More reference data data for Egypt
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2851 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 5.23 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 16.05 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.2 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 16.05 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.956 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.4622 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 25.55 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 71.76 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 6.55 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15) in Egypt?
- Trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15) in Egypt was 38.46 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15) recorded in Egypt?
- The highest recorded value was 38.46 in 2006.
- What is the lowest trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15) recorded in Egypt?
- The lowest recorded value was 30.77 in 2005.
- How does Egypt rank for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15)?
- Egypt ranks 149th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
- Is trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15) rising or falling in Egypt?
- Over the last ten years it is up 25.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Egypt data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.