Egypt vs Trinidad and Tobago: Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15)
Egypt
38.46
in 2014
Trinidad and Tobago
38.46
in 2014
Egypt rank
149th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
149th
Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15) over time
- Egypt
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 38.46 against 38.46 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.
Egypt ranks 149th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 149th of 184 countries.
Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 36.92 | 38.46 | 1.54 | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2010s | 38.46 | 38.46 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15), Egypt or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Egypt, at 38.46 against 38.46 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15) between Egypt and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Egypt and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for trading across borders: documents to import (number) (db06-15)?
- Egypt ranks 149th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 149th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to import (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number of documents to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.