Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol in Botswana
Botswana: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol was 55.56 in 2014. ▬ Flat
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol in Botswana, 2005–2014
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
The most recent figure for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol in Botswana is 55.56, measured in 2014. That is the highest value across all 10 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol in Botswana peaked at 55.56 in 2005 and was at its lowest, 55.56, in 2005.
Botswana ranks 76th of 181 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 55.56 | 55.56 | 55.56 | 5 |
| 2010s | 55.56 | 55.56 | 55.56 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Botswana
- 76 Bangladesh 55.56 compare
- 76 Brazil 55.56 compare
- 76 Argentina 55.56 compare
- 76 Bahrain 55.56 compare
- 76 Croatia 55.56 compare
- 76 Dominica 55.56 compare
- 76 Gabon 55.56 compare
- 76 Gambia 55.56 compare
- 76 Ghana 55.56 compare
- 76 Guinea-Bissau 55.56 compare
- 76 Guyana 55.56 compare
- 76 Hungary 55.56 compare
- 76 Jamaica 55.56 compare
- 76 Kiribati 55.56 compare
- 76 Mali 55.56 compare
- 76 Montenegro 55.56 compare
- 76 North Macedonia 55.56 compare
- 76 Philippines 55.56 compare
- 76 Samoa 55.56 compare
- 76 Saudi Arabia 55.56 compare
- 76 Senegal 55.56 compare
- 76 Serbia 55.56 compare
- 76 East Timor 55.56 compare
- 76 Togo 55.56 compare
- 76 Tonga 55.56 compare
- 76 Uruguay 55.56 compare
- 76 Vanuatu 55.56 compare
- 76 Palestine 55.56 compare
- 76 Yemen 55.56 compare
More reference data data for Botswana
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied to 41.92 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0825 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0.003 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1582 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 7.17 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 1,922 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Crop Residues 11.23 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop re 0.8077 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural Soil 1,899 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0424 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol in Botswana?
- Trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol in Botswana was 55.56 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol recorded in Botswana?
- The highest recorded value was 55.56 in 2005.
- What is the lowest trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol recorded in Botswana?
- The lowest recorded value was 55.56 in 2005.
- How does Botswana rank for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
- Botswana ranks 76th out of 181 countries with data for 2014.
- Is trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol rising or falling in Botswana?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Botswana data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.