Botswana vs Montenegro: Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol

Botswana
55.56
in 2014
Montenegro
55.56
in 2014
Botswana rank
76th
Montenegro rank
76th

Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodol over time

  • Botswana
  • Montenegro
0204060200520092014

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 55.56 against 55.56 in Montenegro, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 76th and Montenegro ranks 76th of 181 countries.

Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Montenegro Difference Ahead
2000s 55.56 44.44 11.11 Botswana
2010s 55.56 55.56 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol, Botswana or Montenegro?
Botswana, at 55.56 against 55.56 in Montenegro as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol between Botswana and Montenegro?
0, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Montenegro?
9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2014.
How do Botswana and Montenegro rank globally for trading across borders: documents to export (number) (db06-15 methodol?
Botswana ranks 76th and Montenegro ranks 76th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Documents to export (number) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the number of documents to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.