Trading across borders (DB06-15 methodology) - Score in Finland
Finland: Trading across borders (DB06-15 methodology) - Score was 89.1 in 2014. ▬ Flat
Trading across borders (DB06-15 methodology) - Score in Finland, 2005–2014
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
Finland recorded 89.1 for trading across borders (db06-15 methodology) - score in 2014.
That represents a change of up 0.1% on the previous year and down 0.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, trading across borders (db06-15 methodology) - score in Finland peaked at 89.48 in 2007 and was at its lowest, 88.55, in 2009.
Finland ranks 14th of 181 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 89.13 | 88.55 | 89.48 | 5 |
| 2010s | 88.87 | 88.61 | 89.1 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Finland
- 11 Malaysia 89.94 compare
- 12 Israel 89.39 compare
- 13 Netherlands 89.22 compare
- 15 United Kingdom 88.32 compare
- 16 United States 88.25 compare
- 17 Mauritius 87.74 compare
More reference data data for Finland
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2998 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1241 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.5 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1748 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.5 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.01 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.6733 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.6503 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 6.94 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.9518 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is trading across borders (db06-15 methodology) - score in Finland?
- Trading across borders (db06-15 methodology) - score in Finland was 89.1 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest trading across borders (db06-15 methodology) - score recorded in Finland?
- The highest recorded value was 89.48 in 2007.
- What is the lowest trading across borders (db06-15 methodology) - score recorded in Finland?
- The lowest recorded value was 88.55 in 2009.
- How does Finland rank for trading across borders (db06-15 methodology) - score?
- Finland ranks 14th out of 181 countries with data for 2014.
- Is trading across borders (db06-15 methodology) - score rising or falling in Finland?
- Over the last ten years it is down 0.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Finland data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Doing Business measures the time and cost associated with exporting and importing a standardized cargo of goods by sea transport. The time and cost necessary to complete 4 predefined stages (document preparation; customs clearance and inspections; inland transport and handling; and port and terminal handling) for exporting and importing the goods are recorded. All documents needed by the trader to export or import the goods across the border are also recorded. The process of exporting goods ranges from packing the goods into the container at the warehouse to their departure from the port of exit. The process of importing goods ranges from the vessel’s arrival at the port of entry to the cargo’s delivery at the warehouse. For landlocked economies, since the seaport is located in the transit economy, the time, cost and documents associated with the processes at the inland border are also included. The score for trading across borders is a simple average of the cost to export and import, time to export and import, and the number documents to export and import. It is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.