How does Peru rank for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?

Peru ranks 50th out of 181 countries with data for 2014.

Is trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met rising or falling in Peru?

Over the last ten years it is down 1.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met in Peru

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met in Peru
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Peru: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met was 88.61 in 2014. ▬ Flat

Latest (2014)

88.61

Change on year

up 0.3%

World rank

50th

of 181 countries

All-time high

91.88

in 2007

All-time low

87.5

in 2008

Years of data

2005–2014

Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 met in Peru, 2005–2014

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2014, trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met in Peru stood at 88.61.

That represents a change of up 0.3% on the previous year and down 1.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met in Peru peaked at 91.88 in 2007 and was at its lowest, 87.5, in 2008.

Peru ranks 50th of 181 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Averages by decade

Decade	Average	Lowest	Highest	Years
2000s	89.59	87.5	91.88	5
2010s	89.04	88.31	90.32	5

Countries ranked near Peru

47 Netherlands 89.23 compare
48 Montenegro 89.05 compare
49 Pakistan 88.7 compare
50 Cyprus 88.61 compare
52 Japan 88.41 compare
53 Poland 88.34 compare

See the full ranking of 183 places →

More reference data data for Peru

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.15 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 4.39 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 7.94 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3808 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 7.94 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.84 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.94 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 18.98 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 35.25 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.07 (2050)

All data for Peru →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met in Peru?: Trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met in Peru was 88.61 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met recorded in Peru?: The highest recorded value was 91.88 in 2007.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met recorded in Peru?: The lowest recorded value was 87.5 in 2008.
How does Peru rank for trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met?: Peru ranks 50th out of 181 countries with data for 2014.
Is trading across borders: cost to import (us$ per container)(db06-15 met rising or falling in Peru?: Over the last ten years it is down 1.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Peru data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to import (US$ per container)(DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.