Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) in San Marino, Republic of

San Marino, Republic of: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) was 85.71 in 2019. β–¬ Flat

Latest (2019)
85.71
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
96th
of 190 countries
All-time high
85.71
in 2014
All-time low
85.71
in 2014
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) in San Marino, Republic of, 2014–2019

0204060802014201620192014: 85.72015: 85.72016: 85.72017: 85.72018: 85.72019: 85.7

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2019, trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) in San Marino, Republic of stood at 85.71. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

San Marino, Republic of ranks 96th of 190 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near San Marino, Republic of

  1. 93 Seychelles 86.79 compare
  2. 94 Comoros, Union of the 86.74 compare
  3. 95 St. Lucia 86.07 compare
  4. 96 India 85.71 compare
  5. 96 United States 85.71 compare
  6. 96 Mexico 85.71 compare
  7. 96 Antigua and Barbuda 85.71 compare
  8. 96 Armenia, Republic of 85.71 compare
  9. 96 Australia 85.71 compare
  10. 96 Djibouti 85.71 compare
  11. 96 Palau, Republic of 85.71 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places β†’

More reference data data for San Marino, Republic of

All data for San Marino, Republic of β†’

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) in San Marino, Republic of?
Trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) in San Marino, Republic of was 85.71 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) recorded in San Marino, Republic of?
The highest recorded value was 85.71 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) recorded in San Marino, Republic of?
The lowest recorded value was 85.71 in 2014.
How does San Marino, Republic of rank for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
San Marino, Republic of ranks 96th out of 190 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) rising or falling in San Marino, Republic of?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this San Marino, Republic of data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV Β· JSON β€” 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) in San Marino, Republic of. Statizoid. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-documentary-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/san-marino/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-documentary-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/san-marino/">Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) in San Marino, Republic of</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.