Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) in Antigua and Barbuda

Antigua and Barbuda: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) was 85.71 in 2019. β–² Rising

Latest (2019)
85.71
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
96th
of 190 countries
All-time high
85.71
in 2016
All-time low
81.15
in 2014
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) in Antigua and Barbuda, 2014–2019

0204060802014201620192014: 81.22015: 81.22016: 85.72017: 85.72018: 85.72019: 85.7

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Antigua and Barbuda recorded 85.71 for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

That represents a change of up 5.6% over ten years.

That places Antigua and Barbuda 96th out of 190 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Antigua and Barbuda

  1. 93 Seychelles 86.79 compare
  2. 94 Comoros 86.74 compare
  3. 95 Saint Lucia 86.07 compare
  4. 96 India 85.71 compare
  5. 96 United States of America 85.71 compare
  6. 96 Mexico 85.71 compare
  7. 96 Armenia 85.71 compare
  8. 96 Australia 85.71 compare
  9. 96 Djibouti 85.71 compare
  10. 96 Palau 85.71 compare
  11. 96 San Marino 85.71 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places β†’

More reference data data for Antigua and Barbuda

All data for Antigua and Barbuda β†’

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) in Antigua and Barbuda?
Trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) in Antigua and Barbuda was 85.71 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) recorded in Antigua and Barbuda?
The highest recorded value was 85.71 in 2016.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) recorded in Antigua and Barbuda?
The lowest recorded value was 81.15 in 2014.
How does Antigua and Barbuda rank for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 96th out of 190 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) rising or falling in Antigua and Barbuda?
Over the last ten years it is up 5.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Antigua and Barbuda data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV Β· JSON β€” 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) in Antigua and Barbuda. Statizoid. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-documentary-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/antigua-and-barbuda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-documentary-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/antigua-and-barbuda/">Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) in Antigua and Barbuda</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.