How does Samoa rank for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) (?

Samoa ranks 147th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.

Is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Samoa?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Samoa data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Samoa

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Samoa
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Samoa: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( was 67.14 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

67.14

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

147th

of 188 countries

All-time high

67.14

in 2014

All-time low

67.14

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Samoa, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2019, trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Samoa stood at 67.14. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

Samoa ranks 147th of 188 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Countries ranked near Samoa

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Samoa

Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.2319 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0396 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0165 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.023 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0918 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0626 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0396 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.077 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure applied to Soils 20.42 (2050)

All data for Samoa →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Samoa?: Trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Samoa was 67.14 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Samoa?: The highest recorded value was 67.14 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Samoa?: The lowest recorded value was 67.14 in 2014.
How does Samoa rank for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) (?: Samoa ranks 147th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Samoa?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Samoa data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.