Myanmar vs Samoa: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (

Myanmar
70
in 2019
Samoa
67.14
in 2019
Myanmar rank
145th
Samoa rank
147th

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( over time

  • Myanmar
  • Samoa
020406080201420162019

How they compare

Myanmar currently reports 70 against 67.14 in Samoa, a difference of 2.86.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Myanmar has been ahead every year.

Myanmar ranks 145th and Samoa ranks 147th of 188 countries.

Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) (, Myanmar or Samoa?
Myanmar, at 70 against 67.14 in Samoa as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( between Myanmar and Samoa?
2.86, with Myanmar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Samoa?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Myanmar and Samoa rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) (?
Myanmar ranks 145th and Samoa ranks 147th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.