Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) in New Zealand

New Zealand: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) was 88.57 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
88.57
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
79th
of 190 countries
All-time high
88.57
in 2014
All-time low
88.57
in 2014
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) in New Zealand, 2014–2019

0204060802014201620192014: 88.62015: 88.62016: 88.62017: 88.62018: 88.62019: 88.6

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

New Zealand recorded 88.57 for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

New Zealand ranks 79th of 190 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) in New Zealand, year by year

Annual values for Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in New Zealand, 2014 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2014 88.57
2015 88.57 +0.0%
2016 88.57 +0.0%
2017 88.57 +0.0%
2018 88.57 +0.0%
2019 88.57 +0.0%

Countries ranked near New Zealand

  1. 77 Eswatini 89.21 compare
  2. 78 China (People’s Republic of) 88.96 compare
  3. 79 Micronesia, Federated States of 88.57 compare
  4. 79 Nepal 88.57 compare
  5. 79 Peru 88.57 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for New Zealand

All data for New Zealand →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) in New Zealand?
Trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) in New Zealand was 88.57 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) recorded in New Zealand?
The highest recorded value was 88.57 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) recorded in New Zealand?
The lowest recorded value was 88.57 in 2014.
How does New Zealand rank for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd)?
New Zealand ranks 79th out of 190 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) rising or falling in New Zealand?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this New Zealand data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) in New Zealand. Statizoid. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-documentary-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-documentary-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/new-zealand/">Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) in New Zealand</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.