Is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Nepal?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Nepal data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Nepal

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Nepal
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Nepal: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( was 88.57 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

88.57

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

78th

of 188 countries

All-time high

88.57

in 2014

All-time low

88.57

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Nepal, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Nepal is 88.57, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

Nepal ranks 78th of 188 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Nepal

76 Eswatini 89.21 compare
77 China 88.96 compare
78 Micronesia (country) 88.57 compare
78 New Zealand 88.57 compare
78 Peru 88.57 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Nepal

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Manure Management 1,421 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Enteric Fermentat 18,167 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure Management 211.32 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure left on Pa 2,990 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Crop Residues 1,133 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural Soil 4,894 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop re 46.85 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 29,323 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 24,171 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.7853 (2050)

All data for Nepal →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Nepal?: Trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Nepal was 88.57 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Nepal?: The highest recorded value was 88.57 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Nepal?: The lowest recorded value was 88.57 in 2014.
How does Nepal rank for trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) (?: Nepal ranks 78th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Nepal?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Nepal data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.