Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in United States
United States: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) was 175 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in United States, 2014–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.
Analysis
United States recorded 175 DB16-20 methodology for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.
That places United States 139th out of 189 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in United States, year by year
| Year | DB16-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 175 DB16-20 methodology | — |
| 2015 | 175 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 175 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 175 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 175 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 175 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
United States compared with similar countries
- United States's 175 DB16-20 methodology is below the median for high income countries, which is 225 DB16-20 methodology, 78% of the median. (62 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near United States
More reference data data for United States
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 19.34 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 24.55 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 119.42 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 20.7 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 119.42 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 64.85 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 52.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 133.45 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 589.96 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 112.69 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in United States?
- Trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in United States was 175 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) recorded in United States?
- The highest recorded value was 175 DB16-20 methodology in 2014.
- What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) recorded in United States?
- The lowest recorded value was 175 DB16-20 methodology in 2014.
- How does United States rank for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd)?
- United States ranks 139th out of 189 countries with data for 2019.
- Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) rising or falling in United States?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this United States data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The cost for border compliance to import records the cost associated with compliance with the economy’s customs regulations and with regulations relating to other inspections that are mandatory in order for the import shipment to cross the economy’s border, as well as the time and cost for handling that takes place at its port or border. It is calculated in US dollars. The cost for this segment include the cost for customs clearance and inspection procedures conducted by other agencies. For example, the cost for conducting a technical standard inspection would be included here. Informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.