Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Micronesia (country)
Micronesia (country): Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) was 180 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Micronesia (country), 2014–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.
Analysis
The most recent figure for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Micronesia (country) is 180 DB16-20 methodology, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.
Micronesia (country) ranks 137th of 186 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Countries ranked near Micronesia (country)
- 134 Mongolia 209.78 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 135 Jordan 205.71 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 136 Nepal 190 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 138 United States 175 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 139 Canada 171.88 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 140 Lesotho 150 DB16-20 methodology compare
- 140 North Macedonia 150 DB16-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Micronesia (country)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Crop Residues 0.0232 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0783 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 24.38 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied to 4.15 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure Management 3.61 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure left on Pa 16.58 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop re 0.0018 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture 3.01 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Manure Management 1.05 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0157 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Micronesia (country)?
- Trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Micronesia (country) was 180 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) recorded in Micronesia (country)?
- The highest recorded value was 180 DB16-20 methodology in 2014.
- What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) recorded in Micronesia (country)?
- The lowest recorded value was 180 DB16-20 methodology in 2014.
- How does Micronesia (country) rank for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd)?
- Micronesia (country) ranks 137th out of 186 countries with data for 2019.
- Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) rising or falling in Micronesia (country)?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Micronesia (country) data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The cost for border compliance to import records the cost associated with compliance with the economy’s customs regulations and with regulations relating to other inspections that are mandatory in order for the import shipment to cross the economy’s border, as well as the time and cost for handling that takes place at its port or border. It is calculated in US dollars. The cost for this segment include the cost for customs clearance and inspection procedures conducted by other agencies. For example, the cost for conducting a technical standard inspection would be included here. Informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.