Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Hong Kong, China
Hong Kong, China: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) was 265.62 DB16-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Hong Kong, China, 2014–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB16-20 methodology.
Analysis
In 2019, trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Hong Kong, China stood at 265.62 DB16-20 methodology. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.
That places Hong Kong, China 120th out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Hong Kong, China, year by year
| Year | DB16-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 265.62 DB16-20 methodology | — |
| 2015 | 265.62 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 265.62 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 265.62 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 265.62 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 265.62 DB16-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Countries ranked near Hong Kong, China
More reference data data for Hong Kong, China
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure left on Pasture 1.38 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.0347 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0052 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Enteric 6.8 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0056 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Burning - Crop 0 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure applied to Soils 1.05 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0 (1990)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Manure Management 0.1704 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Hong Kong, China?
- Trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Hong Kong, China was 265.62 DB16-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) recorded in Hong Kong, China?
- The highest recorded value was 265.62 DB16-20 methodology in 2014.
- What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) recorded in Hong Kong, China?
- The lowest recorded value was 265.62 DB16-20 methodology in 2014.
- How does Hong Kong, China rank for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd)?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 120th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
- Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) rising or falling in Hong Kong, China?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Hong Kong, China data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The cost for border compliance to import records the cost associated with compliance with the economy’s customs regulations and with regulations relating to other inspections that are mandatory in order for the import shipment to cross the economy’s border, as well as the time and cost for handling that takes place at its port or border. It is calculated in US dollars. The cost for this segment include the cost for customs clearance and inspection procedures conducted by other agencies. For example, the cost for conducting a technical standard inspection would be included here. Informal payments for which no receipt is issued are excluded from the costs recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.