Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Peru

Peru: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) was 41.67 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
41.67
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
153rd
of 191 countries
All-time high
41.67
in 2015
All-time low
40.92
in 2014
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Peru, 2014–2019

0102030402014201620192014: 40.92015: 41.72016: 41.72017: 41.72018: 41.72019: 41.7

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Peru is 41.67, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

That represents a change of up 1.8% over ten years.

That places Peru 153rd out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Peru, year by year

Annual values for Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Peru, 2014 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2014 40.92 —
2015 41.67 +1.8%
2016 41.67 +0.0%
2017 41.67 +0.0%
2018 41.67 +0.0%
2019 41.67 +0.0%

Peru compared with similar countries

  • Peru's 41.67 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 68.83, 61% of the median. (56 countries reporting)
  • Peru's 41.67 is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 55, 76% of the median. (33 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Peru

  1. 150 Kiribati 42.92 compare
  2. 151 Belize 42.71 compare
  3. 152 Philippines 42.54 compare
  4. 154 Senegal 41.53 compare
  5. 155 Central African Republic 40.89 compare
  6. 156 Solomon Islands 38.33 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Peru

All data for Peru →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Peru?
Trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Peru was 41.67 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) recorded in Peru?
The highest recorded value was 41.67 in 2015.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) recorded in Peru?
The lowest recorded value was 40.92 in 2014.
How does Peru rank for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd)?
Peru ranks 153rd out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) rising or falling in Peru?
Over the last ten years it is up 1.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Peru data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Peru. Statizoid. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-border-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-border-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/peru/">Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Peru</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,145 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.