Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Nepal?

Over the last ten years it is down 3.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Nepal data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Nepal

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Nepal
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Nepal: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 was 84.17 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

84.17

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

51st

of 188 countries

All-time high

87.04

in 2014

All-time low

84.17

in 2016

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Nepal, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Nepal is 84.17, measured in 2019. That is the lowest value across all 6 years on record.

The figure is down 3.3% over ten years.

Nepal ranks 51st of 188 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Nepal

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Nepal

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Manure Management 1,421 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - Enteric Fermentat 18,167 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure Management 211.32 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure left on Pa 2,990 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Crop Residues 1,133 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural Soil 4,894 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop re 46.85 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 29,323 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 24,171 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.7853 (2050)

All data for Nepal →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Nepal?: Trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Nepal was 84.17 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Nepal?: The highest recorded value was 87.04 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Nepal?: The lowest recorded value was 84.17 in 2016.
How does Nepal rank for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16?: Nepal ranks 51st out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Nepal?: Over the last ten years it is down 3.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Nepal data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.