Mongolia vs Nepal: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16
Mongolia
82.52
in 2019
Nepal
84.17
in 2019
Mongolia rank
53rd
Nepal rank
51st
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 over time
- Mongolia
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 84.17 against 82.52 in Mongolia, a difference of 1.65.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Nepal has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 53rd and Nepal ranks 51st of 188 countries.
Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16, Mongolia or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 84.17 against 82.52 in Mongolia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 between Mongolia and Nepal?
- 1.65, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Nepal?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Mongolia and Nepal rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16?
- Mongolia ranks 53rd and Nepal ranks 51st of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.