Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Ethiopia

Ethiopia: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) was 90 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
90
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
40th
of 191 countries
All-time high
90
in 2014
All-time low
90
in 2014
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Ethiopia, 2014–2019

0204060801002014201620192014: 902015: 902016: 902017: 902018: 902019: 90

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Ethiopia recorded 90 for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

Ethiopia ranks 40th of 191 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Ethiopia, year by year

Annual values for Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Ethiopia, 2014 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2014 90 —
2015 90 +0.0%
2016 90 +0.0%
2017 90 +0.0%
2018 90 +0.0%
2019 90 +0.0%

Ethiopia compared with similar countries

  • Ethiopia's 90 is above the median for low income countries, which is 45.65, 2.0× the median. (24 countries reporting)
  • Ethiopia's 90 is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 50.73, 1.8× the median. (48 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Ethiopia

  1. 37 Bosnia and Herzegovina 90.96 compare
  2. 38 Bhutan 90.82 compare
  3. 39 Switzerland 90.42 compare
  4. 41 Norway 89.58 compare
  5. 42 El Salvador 89.31 compare
  6. 42 Kosovo 89.31 compare
  7. 42 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 89.31 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Ethiopia

All data for Ethiopia →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Ethiopia?
Trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Ethiopia was 90 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) recorded in Ethiopia?
The highest recorded value was 90 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) recorded in Ethiopia?
The lowest recorded value was 90 in 2014.
How does Ethiopia rank for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd)?
Ethiopia ranks 40th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) rising or falling in Ethiopia?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Ethiopia data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Ethiopia. Statizoid. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-border-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/ethiopia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-border-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/ethiopia/">Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Ethiopia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,145 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.