Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Bhutan

Bhutan: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) was 90.82 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
90.82
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
38th
of 191 countries
All-time high
90.82
in 2014
All-time low
90.82
in 2014
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Bhutan, 2014–2019

0204060801002014201620192014: 90.82015: 90.82016: 90.82017: 90.82018: 90.82019: 90.8

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2019, trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Bhutan stood at 90.82. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

That places Bhutan 38th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top quarter.

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Bhutan, year by year

Annual values for Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Bhutan, 2014 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2014 90.82 —
2015 90.82 +0.0%
2016 90.82 +0.0%
2017 90.82 +0.0%
2018 90.82 +0.0%
2019 90.82 +0.0%

Bhutan compared with similar countries

  • Bhutan's 90.82 is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 53.86, 1.7× the median. (47 countries reporting)
  • Bhutan's 90.82 is above the median for South Asia, which is 76.43, 1.2× the median. (6 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Bhutan

  1. 35 Botswana 91.83 compare
  2. 36 Ukraine 91.67 compare
  3. 37 Bosnia and Herzegovina 90.96 compare
  4. 39 Switzerland 90.42 compare
  5. 40 Ethiopia 90 compare
  6. 41 Norway 89.58 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Bhutan

All data for Bhutan →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Bhutan?
Trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Bhutan was 90.82 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) recorded in Bhutan?
The highest recorded value was 90.82 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) recorded in Bhutan?
The lowest recorded value was 90.82 in 2014.
How does Bhutan rank for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd)?
Bhutan ranks 38th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) rising or falling in Bhutan?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Bhutan data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Bhutan. Statizoid. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-border-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/bhutan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-border-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/bhutan/">Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Bhutan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,145 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.