Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Croatia
Croatia: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) was 100 in 2019. ▬ Flat
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Croatia, 2014–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
In 2019, trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Croatia stood at 100. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.
Croatia ranks 1st of 191 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Croatia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 100 | — |
| 2015 | 100 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 100 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 100 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 100 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 100 | +0.0% |
Croatia compared with similar countries
- Croatia's 100 is above the median for high income countries, which is 81.25, 1.2× the median. (62 countries reporting)
- Croatia's 100 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 100, 1.0× the median. (49 countries reporting)
Countries ranked near Croatia
- 1 Armenia 100 compare
- 1 Austria 100 compare
- 1 Belarus 100 compare
- 1 Belgium 100 compare
- 1 Bulgaria 100 compare
- 1 Czechia 100 compare
- 1 Denmark 100 compare
- 1 Estonia 100 compare
- 1 Finland 100 compare
- 1 France 100 compare
- 1 Germany 100 compare
- 1 Greece 100 compare
- 1 Hungary 100 compare
- 1 Italy 100 compare
- 1 Kazakhstan 100 compare
- 1 Latvia 100 compare
- 1 Lithuania 100 compare
- 1 Luxembourg 100 compare
- 1 Netherlands 100 compare
- 1 Poland 100 compare
- 1 Portugal 100 compare
- 1 Romania 100 compare
- 1 Slovakia 100 compare
- 1 Slovenia 100 compare
- 1 Spain 100 compare
- 1 Sweden 100 compare
- 1 United Kingdom 100 compare
More reference data data for Croatia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2598 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1516 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.85 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1326 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.85 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.8711 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.5399 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.6476 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 8.13 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.7218 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Croatia?
- Trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Croatia was 100 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) recorded in Croatia?
- The highest recorded value was 100 in 2014.
- What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) recorded in Croatia?
- The lowest recorded value was 100 in 2014.
- How does Croatia rank for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd)?
- Croatia ranks 1st out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) rising or falling in Croatia?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Croatia data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.